Tuesday, 17 September 2019

New Reality v Old Illusions

Do you care to know the difference between actuality (reality) and the illusions you believe in? Then begin by never simply believing in anything. Examine the independently verifiable evidence and weigh it for yourself. You can't do this if you are so lazy you actually prefer to be lied to.


A.I. Killer Robots and Google

Will A.I. greatly harm humanity?


Sunday, 15 September 2019

Spaffer Johnson is Barking Mad

New allegations emerge that Prime Minister Boris Johnson has twice been ticketed for dangerously riding through red traffic stop lights on his bicycle



What on Earth is wrong with Boris Johnson? Is he totally insane?


Saturday, 14 September 2019

Food Fight For Health

Who wants a food fight for health? I do!


Tuesday, 10 September 2019

Networked British Toffs Have Misled Us All

Landed gentry member Charles Darwin and his toff pals misled the world


.

Saturday, 7 September 2019

Friday, 6 September 2019

Tories are not normal people. They are very damaged individuals in need of our help

Tories are sadly damaged people. Some even eat their boogers in public on TV! Here we see Iain - the Brexit Bogeyman - Duncan Smith doing just that in September 2019 in Parliament. This is toxic normalcy



POSTSCRIPT 

Brilliant article in the Guardian on this

Here:  https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/sep/08/is-iain-duncan-smith-brexit-bogeyman?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Tweet

. .
. .

Distinguished Professor Mark Griffiths of Nottingham Trent University Explains why there is Something Very Fishy about Claims made by Darwin fans

Charles Darwin did not coin the term "living fossil" - but you try telling that to a Worshipful Darwin Footwasher and they simply won't believe you - no matter how hard the proof.


Darwin's and Wallace's lies and plagiarism caused the Holocaust

The newly unearthed BigData reveals that Charles Darwin's science fraud by way of lies and plagiarism caused the Holocaust!




Thursday, 5 September 2019

Darwin's Plagiarism caused the Holocaust!

Charles Darwin's plagiarising science fraud and lies about Patrick Matthew caused the Holocaust.


Sunday, 1 September 2019

Wikipedia Desperate Fact Denial English Turds

Tuesday, 20 August 2019

Create #Treesprawl

On Treesprawl - something we all can do. Plant trees. Copy the Mapperley Park Model - ensure trees in urban areas are all covered with a conservation area scheme.


Friday, 16 August 2019

Darwin and the Peterloo Masacre

Charles Darwin was actually a nasty ruling class establishment beardy git. Get the facts not the infected crumbs fed to you from out of his nasty Glutton Club owl eating face hair




Thursday, 15 August 2019

Glass Fiber Boats are NOT eco friendly

Monday, 12 August 2019

Monday, 15 July 2019

Racist Trump

Trump is a racist



IMAGE FILE


ARCHIVED HERE

+

Sunday, 16 June 2019

SOMEONE SHOULD MAKE A FEATURE FILM ABOUT THE ENTIRE STORY OF PATRICK MATTHEW

PROUD SCOTTISH FILMMAKER WANTED


Saturday, 8 June 2019

Trump is a total fool

The President of the USA thinks the Moon is part of Mars http://archive.is/7582c

Friday, 26 April 2019

Badly worded questions


In Maths classes 
.

Biology examinations


Trump recants his anti-vax stance. Were they baby killing tweets?

Hard Data on Managerialist Stupidity and Lost Plot Work

.

Monday, 15 April 2019

They know not what they had

Sunday, 14 April 2019

On the plagiarism of facts by those who fell for the dysology they debunk

.

Friday, 12 April 2019

Blatant Lies at the Heart of the Establishment

Tuesday, 2 April 2019

Worlds Worst PR Disasters

IMAGES CONTENT ARCHIVED: http://archive.is/BguSV and NTU content on its April Fools joke here http://archive.is/C1kmR

Nottingham Trent University April Fools day (2019) joke backfires on April 2nd.  I bet the senior managers and Board of Governors wish they had that cloak today. Because, seriously, what the jobs for academic dullards cult of managerialism is doing is no joke for the proper academics at NTU.


Next day, April 2nd (2019) the cloak was lifted on Twitter and by the Times Higher

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/union-says-intolerable-workloads-driving-rise-staff-sickness#comment-37011

References

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5Xcs45ovQ8&feature=youtu.be

The Times Higher Education (THE) https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/union-says-intolerable-workloads-driving-rise-staff-sickness

PLEASE RE-TWEET


Monday, 18 March 2019

Coincidence: Or not, as the case may be

Coincidence?



Sent from a topographic ocean of demented and delusional harassment

Saturday, 16 March 2019

Hell has a Place for Science Fraudsters: Cheat and be Damned for Eternity on the Internet



Don't be a Darwin


Sunday, 10 March 2019

Darwin Cat, Darwin Cat, Darwin Cat, sitting on the door mat!

For 160 years, pseudo scholars and ignorant creationist have lampooned Charles Darwin as a monkey or ape. They got that wrong. They should have been lampooning him as a copycat.

Darwin is the world's greatest plagiarising science fraudster by glory theft of a prior published theory. A theory that his friends, influencers and influencer's influencers read and are newly discovered to have cited in the literature before he or Wallace wrote a word on the topic anywhere (see Nullius).

Sunday, 10 February 2019

Felson's RAT notion of Crime Opportunity is not a cause of crime

Thursday, 7 February 2019

On The Immortal Shame of the Linnean Journal

Antixaxxers such as the famous plagiarist Alfred Russel Wallace and other pillocks

We know that Alfred Wallace, like Charles Darwin (1858/59), committed the world's greatest science fraud by plagiarising Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior published theory of evolution by natural selection years after their friends, correspondents, editors and influencer's influencers had cited it in the historic literature record (see the fully referenced independently verifiable facts of that matter: Here, here and here). Alfred Wallace also paved the way for today's anti-vaccination movement (see the facts here). What a prat! No really, Wallace was. The utter pillock not only claimed to have conceived Matthew's prior published theory (which we newly know - thanks to my original research - Selby, the editor of Wallace's famous Sarawak paper, read and prior-cited) during the world's only stupidly claimed bout of cognitive enhancing malarial fever, he also ardently believed in ghosts and the silly ghost table-turning claims of parlour room mediums (see the facts here).

Today, to its eternal shame, the Linnean Journal - which published Darwin's and Wallace's first act of joint plagiarism of Matthew's theory in 1858 - published a desperately daft-as-a-brush paper by someone called Dagg, which blatantly plagiarised my Selby cited Matthew discovery by failing to cite me as its discoverer. Dagg then bragged to the obscene lonely and obsessed weirdo harassing stalker Julian Derry about failing to cite me (read all the verifiable fully referenced facts here). Doesn't look like a great advert for the Linnean Society and its journal does it. Prattism appears to be contagious. Maybe we need to work harder to discover an efficacious inoculation against it.

So Many People Don't Really Understand the Theory of Macroevolution by Natural Selection

-

Monday, 4 February 2019

When Artificial Intelligence is the Problem and Not any Solution

Did Google's Rank Brain autonomous AI program wreck the Google Library?


Wednesday, 23 January 2019

Further pre-1858 Citations of Matthew's 1831 Book

Following the many newly unearthed citations of Matthew's (1831) book "On Naval Timber and Arboriculture " revealed in  'Nullius in Verba Darwin's: greatest secret' (Sutton 2014, 2017), here are some newly discovered others that I  found in Jan 2019

1. The anonymous essayist "S G 2" pp 226-227. "Economical uses of the Larch" in  Knight's Penny Magazine, Volume 3, [edited by Charles Knight.] https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=W-E2AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA227&dq=%22Mathew%22+%22naval+timber%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizr_2xvIPgAhURtnEKHRn9BQwQ6AEIXjAJ#v=onepage&q=%22Mathew%22%20%22naval%20timber%22&f=false

2. Patrick Matthew citing his (1831) book in  'Testimonials in favour of W.L. Lindsay ... as a candidate for the office of Conservator of the museum of the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh (1852). - Note in this same publication we find a testimonial by Robert Jameson (Darwin's Geology professor no less!Moreover the testimonials are for a naturalist whose work Darwin later relied upon!) (Click here for the details) 

Friday, 18 January 2019

The Evolution of Fraud




Tuesday, 15 January 2019

Credulous Darwin Worshippers

Darwin and Wallace worshippers (those who unscientifically and credulously desperately deify the proven liar and plagiarist Charles Darwin and his plagiarist friend Alfred Wallace) have lost their pants in public as a result of the new data that has acted like an unwelcome enema, leading them to soil themselves in public (e.g. here).

Here is just one very small, yet not insignificant, example of the New Data (detected with the innovative Big Data  IDD research method), which completely debunks the Darwinist myth, started as a lie by Charles Darwin (because Matthew had already told him the opposite was true) that Matthew was a little know author on scottish forest trees, whose original ideas no one read. In reality, Matthew's (1831) work was prominently advertised in the Encyclopedia Britannica (p. 407) of 1842, the very year in which Darwin wrote his first private essay on the topic of Matthew's prior published theory of what Matthew originally coined the 'natural process of slection' and Darwin four-word shuffle plagiarized into the 'process of natural slection'. This is just one of so many newly uncovered examples of the prominence of Matthew's book and the bombshell breakthrough ideas in it in the first half of the 19th century.




Wednesday, 9 January 2019

On The Loudon Blyth Connection: Matthewian Knowledge Contamination Probability

We know that in 1832 Loudon reviewed Matthew's (1831) book and most significantly noted that Matthew had something original to say on what he called 'The Origin of Species' no less. Other writers, such as Eiseley and Dempster have noted that Loudon was founder and editor of the Journal that later published Blyth's important articles in the 1835 and 1836 on natural selection. However neither writer appears to have noted - because they most certainly never pointed it out - that Loudon (as editor) could have in some way provided a route for unique Matthewian  knowledge contamination of Blyth's brain - and therefore of Darwin's and Wallace's  brains, pre-1858. Because we know both Darwin and Wallace read those Blyth articles before they replicated Matthew's theory.
+

+

+