The Great Dog Bottom Swap Theft!

On plagiarism of anonymous sources

On plagiarism

The children's book "The Great Dog Bottom Swap" essentially plagiarizes (because it fails to reference it in any way) an piece of anonymous Australian Bush poetry entitled "The Dog's Meeting" pic.twitter.com/FfFHgpLwrs

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 19, 2019

Some attribute the orignal poem to the Australian Henry Lawson (c1910).

Here is my Amazon book review of The Great Dog Bottom Swap 
.

Dr. Sutton, iyo, would Matthews have written the same sorts of things as CRD in "Origin", supposing CRD had not "beaten him to it"?

— The Beagler (@DarwinsWeasel) September 20, 2019

.

(1) Looking at your question the right way around according to linear time, without Darwin having an 1840s (private essay) & 1859 virgin conception miracle of Matthew's 1831 prior published theory, his essential four words term for it "process of natural selection" which.... (2) https://t.co/5XJ0EaF0q8

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 20, 2019

.

(3) Darwin needed to rip off Matthew's original breakthrough concept and his original creative examples used to explain it. Analogously, Darwin was as dependent on plagiarizing Matthew as the author of The Great Dog Bottom Swap needed to plagiarize an anonymously authored poem pic.twitter.com/ahiysdko0D

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 20, 2019