Robin Hood

Watched 3 episodes of BBC series Robin Hood. So @bbceducation people in middle ages had amalgam fillings in their teeth, machine sewed artificial fiber clothes, factory made leather boots & rainbow trout were already introduced into England. Whatever next?https://t.co/wU1vvCDDzx

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 27, 2019

Stephen Downing and Miscarriage of Justice

I just reviewed "The Case of Stephen Downing" a Pen and Sword

'true Crime' publication on the Internet Journal of criminology website:

You can read my review of this book here 

Darwin at Xmas

Darwin worshipers have their own little Xmas virgin conception miracle. The poor deluded fools: https://t.co/H1n7xn1I7p pic.twitter.com/hRmVa41lyZ

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) December 21, 2019

Poor scholarship by pretending secondary sources are primary and associated brute censorship by failure to cite original sources

Ian Hardie and his wife discovered that many authors, including Jim Dempster have mistranscribed a letter from Darwin to Matthew. Tipped off by an email from Ian on 9th November 2019, I verified his finding and found that The Darwin Correspondence project (archived here) and others have not only mistranscribed the letter sent from Darwin to Matthew to have it that Darwin writes: "Your parable of the Damascus woman is quite new to me & very striking." In fact, we can see from the photograph of the letter (as opposed to replicating citations and then pretending the words copied come from visiting the National Library of Scotland) Darwin actually wrote: "Your parable of the Damascus Woman is quite new to me and my thinking."

My further research after being tipped off by Ian Hardie found the source of what we might call the "striking error" that others have copied without due citation to him is W. T. Calman (1912, pp. 451- 457) who was shown the three letters on or before 1912 by Matthew's daughter Euphemia. Claman (1912 p. 451) wrote that the letters had never before been published. Matthew and Darwin scholars should note that the above letter is one of the three later originally found by Ian Hardie and Min Hunter at the home of John Matthew after his death. They set up the Patrick Matthew Trust, which employed Jim Dempster to research and write on this topic.

Using a secondary transcribed source such as Calman's published transcription of 1912 yet citing the material as though it is the primary source whist ignorantly replicating a transcription error unique to the secondary source is one of the most simple forms of poor scholarship counting as academic misconduct by plagiarism. This mistranscription and wrong attribution issue on the Darwin Correspondence website and elsewhere in the literature on Darwin and Matthew is just one more ironic example of the many issues of dreadful scholarship plagiarism that that run through the so called "Darwin industry" like hidden woodworm in an antique.

By way of another ironic example of even worse academic misconduct by plagiarism we can see Dagg's disgraceful plagiarism in the Linnean Journal, in a paper that desperately tries to argue - through what is arguably the most pitiful systematic failure to cite the most relevant compelling newly published evidence of it - against Darwin’s plagiarism. Dagg plagiarised, by failure to cite me as the discoverer even though he knew I discovered it, my original unearthing in 2013 (and first published in 2014 and then in two peer reviewed papers, Sutton 2014 and 2015) that Selby (editor of the journal that published Wallace's 1855 Sarawak paper, which Darwin read pre-1858) cited Matthew's 1831 book and the original ideas in it years before Darwin and Wallace wrote on the topic. See all the fully referenced and evidenced details here of Dagg's ironic plagiarism (perhaps the most ironic example of plagiarism in history?) of my original research, which he had prior read and commented upon at length elsewhere on the Internet. 

The important issue to note here is that the Darwin Correspondence Project and others all one way or another appear to have copied/replicated Caimen's and other's subsequent publication of the mistranscription, but essentially pretended they got the text from the original letters National Library of Scotland or from them as an orignal source in someway being elsewhere, which scholars in the know can prove is impossible. I think this is most ironic given the issue at the heart of this Matthew and Darwin topic being one of plagiarism and failure to truthfully reference sources. Just as Darwin did not want to cite Matthew the dangerous radical Chartist leader, Christian god and priest and upper-class mocking atheist, it appears that these Darwin Industry members have behaved similarly. Indeed, John van Wyhe a major force behind the Darwin Correspondence Project resigned from the editorial board of the Polish journal that published my 2015 article on the independently verifiable evidence of Darwin's plagiarism. He then emailed a Scottish journalist to claim that the new and independently verifiable evidence of who I discovered did read and cite the book containing Matthew's prior published theory is nothing more than silly. See the detailed facts of that story here.

Note: For the historical record, I have a copy of van Wyhe's Sutton's research on Darwin and Matthew is a "conspiracy theory' email that he sent to a Scottish journalist. But for reasons of his copyright, I cannot legally publish it. 

Of course, again with great irony, in reality, conspiracy theories are those that tautologically claim there is conspiracy because people are conspiring, because the evidence of that conspiracy is not available, because there has been a cover-up of it. That most certainly is not the case in this story, as the independently verifiable published and expertly peer reviewed facts prove.

Proper academics interested in how the so-called "scientific establishment" seeks to silence those who bust much loved myths with new facts may care to note that Dr Mike Weale (then Reader in Statistical Genetics at Kings College London - the owner of the "Patrick Matthew Project" website wrote an email in 2016 to the VC of Nottingham Trent University - where I then worked before my retirement in 2018 as Reader in Criminology in a vicious attempt to have me disciplined or perhaps even sacked for what I wrote about van Wyhe's dreadful behaviour. Weale failed, of course, because an independent investigation by a Professor of Law and by HR at the university exonerated me of misconduct and pointed out Weal's disingenuity. Again, for the historical record, I have Weal's ludicrous, malicious, email to the VC Edward Peck and a copy of the findings of the investigation that exonerate me of academic misconduct. 

Scholars of plagiarism and poor scholarship know that offenders are caught out when they copy mistranscribed text from secondary sources whist citing the primary source as where they got it. By comparing a photographic image of his original letter to his mother with the version of it he transcribed in his memoirs, I originally proved that Wallace slyly lied in his autobiography to cover up the fact he bragged to his mother that Darwin and his cronies were going to pay him for co-operating in essentially pretending that he and Darwin jointly but independently discovered Matthew's prior published theory independently of its prior published source in Matthew’s 1831 book. Get the independently verifiable facts here.

Furthermore, I conducted an experiment that proved official Wikipedia editors of the Wikipedia page on Patrick Matthew are systematically deleting my newly unearthed facts about who read and reviewed and sought to brute censor so much as private rumination on Matthew's breakthrough years before Darwin or Wallace penned a word on the topic (see the results here).

I suspect the Darwinites running the Darwin Correspondence Project will seek next to slyly hide the plagiarism of Calman's erroneous 1912 miss-transcription by editing the page with reference to the correct content of the original letter on the web page of PatrickMatthew.com, yet fail to admit it. But they cannot hide what they did. Because their original page is now archived for all to see, here:  http://archive.is/IGEq3

Liars, plagiarists and malicious fact deniers always come undone in the end when facts follow their age old habit of burrowing to the surface. Then they get their rightful place in history. The facts and their deniers that is. 

Articles on my spinach mythbust

My Mythbusting articles on Spinach

Spinach, Iron and Popeye: Ironic lessons from biochemistry and history on the importance of healthy eating, healthy scepticism and adequate citation (Sutton 2010) (here and here and also here)

The Spinach, Popeye, Iron, Decimal Error Myth is Finally Busted (Sutton, M. 2010) (here)

Did Popeye Really Increase Spinach Consumption and Production by 33 percent in 1936? (here)(Original Best Thinking blog post archived in full here)

SPIN@GE USA Beware of the Bull: The United States Department of Agriculture is Spreading Bull about Spinach, Iron and Vitamin C (Sutton 2011) (Here)

Spin@ge II: Does the United States Department of Agriculture’s Publication of Spuriofacts Have its Origins in a Perverse Scientific Paper Written in 1937? (Sutton, M. June 2012) (here and archived here)

How the spinach, Popeye and iron decimal point error myth was finally bust (Sutton 2010) (Here and also here)

On Brexit and Magical Thinking

Many idiots engage in magical thinking, believing that if they write or say something it simply becomes somehow true by their act of stating it to be so.

And then we have the Conservative Party https://t.co/X6NhsKZRIu pic.twitter.com/C975kVMkmG

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 9, 2019

Boris Johnson 100% proven serial liar and fraudster. Charles Darwin 100% serial liar and fraudster by plagiarism

Boris and Darwin. A Right Pair of #Toff Serial Liars and Fraudsters

Privileged #Toff Boris is a 100% proven serial liar & fraudster. Did you know #BigData research methods have 100% proven Charles Darwin was also a serial liar & fraudster?

Independently verifiable facts all here:

1. https://t.co/E8QuuMR3Kj

2. (Method) https://t.co/Nli3gCig7e pic.twitter.com/pX1JEwx161

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) October 7, 2019

Boris Johnson a "Model of Restraint" or a Model in Restraints?

When challenged on his use of inflammatory language in Parliament, at the same time he is under investigation for awarding a contact to his "friend" who was a model, Boris replied that he thinks he was a "model of restraint". Did he do this to game your search engine? To game you. To game the wider public?

Don't forget folks, when Johnson uses an odd or awkward turn of phrase it's because he's playing the analytics in the search engines to bury the stories in favour of putting himself in a positive light...

He's gaming us all... https://t.co/lwnvlpxaDw

— A plague on them 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧🇪🇺🇺🇳 (@bobreeduk) September 29, 2019

Let's Get Boris Done!

Let's just "get Boris done". Arrest the dangerous criminal for the sake of his potential victims! #GetBorisDone

For the sake of the UK, we need to just #GetBorisDone

The Serial Criminal Cycling on the Pavement / Pedestrian Only Area Prime Ministerial #Cycligan pictures pic.twitter.com/XwGFyRGNQP

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 28, 2019

.

So #BaaBaaHumbugSheep. Who wants Brexit done? pic.twitter.com/qCJ8Bpj7RK

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 29, 2019

.

On #Brexit: The new Anthem of the moronic #Thickiteers#Bah! bah #humbug sheep pic.twitter.com/d7ynoEawll

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 29, 2019

Tory Crimes and Incitement to Violence of Boris and his Gang

Typical

Hopefully you will cross his path and he runs you over .

— Chris Hudson (@hudson1469) September 27, 2019

The Boris Humbug

This is humbug. Bah! .

Tories cannot answer the question asked today many times, in many different ways, "How on Earth can Boris Johnson possibly break the law & comply with the law at the same time?"

Can he really suspend all known laws of physics & logic? #Borishumbug pic.twitter.com/KP1bTpcima

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 26, 2019

Antisemitism in Science

By failing to address the facts of his lies and plagiarism, and the probable reasons for them, are Darwin worshipers are being antisemitic?

Why is the so-called scientific establishment so reluctant to ditch the Victorian illusion and face the 21st century proven - expert peer reviewed - actuality of Darwin's and Wallace's (unearthed with #BigData) plagiarism? Are they being #AntiSemitic? 🙊>> https://t.co/M2x3MMy61W pic.twitter.com/cYpQHUuCiV

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 22, 2019

.

They got me! https://t.co/Je0KyY5gWQ pic.twitter.com/Gf7FqEHwWk

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 22, 2019

Credulous Creationists Love the Idea of Miracles Being Real

Surely it should be unsurprising that creationists love the establishment miracle myth that Darwin and Wallace - though surrounded by men who read and cited it and then influenced them and their influencers - independently conceived Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior published theory of evolution by natural selection and his explanatory analogies and examples.

It's unsurprising credulous creationists swallowed & encourage the establishment science myth, started by Darwin and Wallace that they, independently of its originator, Patrick Matthew, miraculously arrived at his theory of evolution by natural selection. https://t.co/ZCZSUCDQ1P

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 21, 2019

The day a hot dog saved my life

Being kind to stray animals can pay off in ways you could hardly imagine

Congratulations Mike! You've won a copy of Sophie's Further Adventures! Please DM me your address and I'll send the book to you.

— Dick King-Smith HQ (@DickKingSmith) September 16, 2019

.

You're very welcome. Hope your daughter enjoys it.

— Dick King-Smith HQ (@DickKingSmith) September 19, 2019

Image archive

The Crypto Queen

On the dangers of being hoodwinked by very convincing fraudsters. 

Building on my recent expert peer reviewed criminological research into Darwin's and Wallace's newly proven lies and plagiarism (e.g. Sutton 2014), facilitated by the Darwin Industry and actuality denying lazy/credulous scientists and historians, I highly recommend readers follow this amazing story of a £4 billion crypto currency scam.

Here is Part 1 of  The Missing Cryptoqueen

On #HiTechCrime , #NetCrime @philwane - The Missing Cryptoqueen - a podcast on the BBC website.

How did this woman scam people out of £4 billion and then vanish with no trace after flying to Athens? Why was she able to convince people she was legitimate? https://t.co/gGbEob2nCF

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 19, 2019

The Great Dog Bottom Swap Theft!

On plagiarism of anonymous sources

On plagiarism

The children's book "The Great Dog Bottom Swap" essentially plagiarizes (because it fails to reference it in any way) an piece of anonymous Australian Bush poetry entitled "The Dog's Meeting" pic.twitter.com/FfFHgpLwrs

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 19, 2019

Some attribute the orignal poem to the Australian Henry Lawson (c1910).

Here is my Amazon book review of The Great Dog Bottom Swap 
.

Dr. Sutton, iyo, would Matthews have written the same sorts of things as CRD in "Origin", supposing CRD had not "beaten him to it"?

— The Beagler (@DarwinsWeasel) September 20, 2019

.

(1) Looking at your question the right way around according to linear time, without Darwin having an 1840s (private essay) & 1859 virgin conception miracle of Matthew's 1831 prior published theory, his essential four words term for it "process of natural selection" which.... (2) https://t.co/5XJ0EaF0q8

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 20, 2019

.

(3) Darwin needed to rip off Matthew's original breakthrough concept and his original creative examples used to explain it. Analogously, Darwin was as dependent on plagiarizing Matthew as the author of The Great Dog Bottom Swap needed to plagiarize an anonymously authored poem pic.twitter.com/ahiysdko0D

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 20, 2019

New Reality v Old Illusions

Do you care to know the difference between actuality (reality) and the illusions you believe in? Then begin by never simply believing in anything. Examine the independently verifiable evidence and weigh it for yourself. You can't do this if you are so lazy you actually prefer to be lied to.

Newly Unearthed Reality versus Old Illusions.

We live in a world where fake news now passes scrutiny with impunity. This should come as no surprise when we allow our scientific community to similarly hoodwink us.https://t.co/JvGKxqRwHL pic.twitter.com/XXX0RiKCo2

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 17, 2019

A.I. Killer Robots and Google

Will A.I. greatly harm humanity?

Recently read more about potential risk of AI to humans If it helps to provide research based & expert peer reviewed evidence @lauralifts

Professor Mark Griffiths and I have published on our findings on important problem with Google's Rank Brain AI - SEE https://t.co/Nli3gCzRvO pic.twitter.com/ioS6omaoqU

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 17, 2019

Spaffer Johnson is Barking Mad

New allegations emerge that Prime Minister Boris Johnson has twice been ticketed for dangerously riding through red traffic stop lights on his bicycle

It is true that photographically proven #cycligan Boris has ridden like a dangerous thug on the pavements outside his flat & given his wife an illegal backie on it.

Now it is newly alleged that he but has also been twice fined for riding his bicycle through red traffic lights. https://t.co/rPmg09yMxb pic.twitter.com/9raNCjMyRB

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 15, 2019

What on Earth is wrong with Boris Johnson? Is he totally insane?

WTF is wrong with Prime Minister of the UK #SpaffyJohnson? Is he totally barking mad or what? pic.twitter.com/qWigJL7zCz

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 15, 2019

Food Fight For Health

Who wants a food fight for health? I do!

How about a national #FoodFightForHealth? Can be fight back against dementia risk? @Hollyonline

Can we really fight the risk of contracting Alzheimer's Disease with food?

Scientists think we can with #PurpleFood See the claims made for the evidence: https://t.co/ROshR8XBmQ pic.twitter.com/uritnGlvpl

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 14, 2019

Networked British Toffs Have Misled Us All

Landed gentry member Charles Darwin and his toff pals misled the world

In these interesting political times, criminologists, other social and natural scientists - and others interested in how networked toffs have lied to the people to support their own privileged interests only - might find this an interesting true story https://t.co/RlqMoRc7wL pic.twitter.com/e03Gr0ArX8

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 10, 2019

.

Former Home Office top lawyer and Head of Liberty makes it clear that Mr Johnson (don't call him Boris - that is his middle name) is an undemocratic dishonest thug, supported by a gang of thugs - NOT NORMAL PEOPLE. NO RESPECT FOR THE LAW OR NORMAL PEOPLE: https://t.co/roGFs4VGem

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 10, 2019

Surreal Politics

Rees Mogg Sleeps on a Bench

UK politics is going through its surreal period this year! @ReesMogg @toryparty @ToryPartyblog @chunkymark @SurrealArtwork @tatemodern @DrMarkGriffiths pic.twitter.com/5rjige1wYE

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 7, 2019

Tories are not normal people. They are very damaged individuals in need of our help

Tories are sadly damaged people. Some even eat their boogers in public on TV! Here we see Iain - the Brexit Bogeyman - Duncan Smith doing just that in September 2019 in Parliament. This is toxic normalcy

They even eat boogers in Parliament. So, these are not "normal people" Janey. They are clearly mentally ill and need to be helped - not elected for our entertainment. Shame on you Janey Godley for mocking those afflicted with #TorySyndrome. Apologise now! https://t.co/ubeyal6VKY

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 6, 2019

POSTSCRIPT 

Brilliant article in the Guardian on this

Here:  https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/sep/08/is-iain-duncan-smith-brexit-bogeyman?CMP=Share_AndroidApp_Tweet

Good grief! What did Iain Duncan Smith the Tory #BrexitBogeyman do to deserve this? You'd think he Tweet-posted a video of himself picking his nose and eating it in Parliament https://t.co/wLPX6kkk3Q for God's sake! pic.twitter.com/q8FnDsommi

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 8, 2019

.

This is #ToxicNormalcy - "America picks its nose and the tories do the same and then they eat it!" The DIRTY old B'stards!https://t.co/R5r1Xy54oR pic.twitter.com/NXujvTTPDo

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 8, 2019

.

Open Tweet to Iain Duncan - The #BrexitBogeynman - Smith. No need to eat your own boogers mate. There is free dog food on offer! No one need go hungry in the UK today or tomorrow. Or for at least 2 weeks! @iainDuncanSmith @BorisJohnson https://t.co/qGX7RZwSzl

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 8, 2019

.

Coming up soon: Javid will make lovely rum truffles from his own poo and then eat them in the House of commons with his bare hands - as an act of post political era Tory #toxicnormalcy ---- ->https://t.co/wLPX6kkk3Q https://t.co/6awUQTMukh

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 8, 2019

.

Images of Tory #ToxicNormalcy from 2019 pic.twitter.com/iVzT7cJHpf

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 8, 2019

.

Oh Contraire! It is the haunted Victorian pencil's college Ian Duncan - snot gurgle - Smith who has done that. Broadcast world wide picking his nose and eating it in Parliament! https://t.co/R5r1Xy54oR https://t.co/JOkkhBeLIz pic.twitter.com/lTsNYb5PQe

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 30, 2019

Distinguished Professor Mark Griffiths of Nottingham Trent University Explains why there is Something Very Fishy about Claims made by Darwin fans

Charles Darwin did not coin the term "living fossil" - but you try telling that to a Worshipful Darwin Footwasher and they simply won't believe you - no matter how hard the proof.

Distinguished Professor @DrMarkGriffiths Writes on the IDD #BigData method and Charles Darwin: Something really fishy: A brief look at the coelacanth, the ‘living fossil’:
https://t.co/XOU6xSIXFz

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 6, 2019

Darwin's and Wallace's lies and plagiarism caused the Holocaust

The newly unearthed BigData reveals that Charles Darwin's science fraud by way of lies and plagiarism caused the Holocaust!

Intersection between scientific fraud & #HateCrime
New found data suggests Charles Darwin's lies & plagiarism of Chartist leader & Scottish naturalist Patrick Matthew's original theory of macroevolution by natural selection underpinned Holocaust https://t.co/H24sKXAG8Z pic.twitter.com/Ordkib3goU

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 6, 2019

Darwin's Plagiarism caused the Holocaust!

Charles Darwin's plagiarising science fraud and lies about Patrick Matthew caused the Holocaust.

On the basis of independently verifiable newly unearthed evidence from the publication record combined with the plausible possibility of cause and effect, I have come to the conclusion that Charles Darwin's science fraud by plagiarism caused the Holocaust: https://t.co/lInKRtP6dz pic.twitter.com/Cfy52oZsve

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) September 5, 2019

Wikipedia Desperate Fact Denial English Turds

Proud Scots where are you? Fight for your heritage!
Read carefully what English turds on Wikipedia have done to fact deny the newly discovered data on Darwin's & Wallace's plagiarism of the Scot Patrick Matthew's original discovery of natural selection: https://t.co/JRvvRYUQoy pic.twitter.com/p7WwHrkV6q

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) September 1, 2019

Create #Treesprawl

On Treesprawl - something we all can do. Plant trees. Copy the Mapperley Park Model - ensure trees in urban areas are all covered with a conservation area scheme.

Should you support those sailing an ecologically toxic glass reinforced plastic boat to boost their huge carbon footprint multimillionaire family brand, or those flying Royal Family private jets everywhere to lecture us on climate change? Or Maybe just plant trees in urban areas? pic.twitter.com/x1rlnnSt1X

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 20, 2019

Darwin and the Peterloo Masacre

Charles Darwin was actually a nasty ruling class establishment beardy git. Get the facts not the infected crumbs fed to you from out of his nasty Glutton Club owl eating face hair

Be prepared to know what you have been taught by the "Establishment" about Darwin being a benign, kind, independent discovery genius is fake & based on his deliberate lies about his science fraud.

Charles Darwin and the #PeterlooMassacre Get the facts https://t.co/ITa8NT9t8O pic.twitter.com/tghWUyGUIV

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 16, 2019

Glass Fiber Boats are NOT eco friendly

"YOU WISH you too could be rich enough to sail a nasty eco-unfriendly Glass Reinforced Plastic totally unnecessary rich persons plaything and pay for the PR to convince idiots like you that we multi millionaire famous Swedes are saving the planet from climate disaster. Don't you" pic.twitter.com/MqMnOFmND6

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) August 15, 2019

Does wood have a memory?

I added another string to my bow today pic.twitter.com/NwePyYT11h

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 11, 2019

Racist Trump

Trump is a racist

....and viciously telling the people of the United States, the greatest and most powerful Nation on earth, how our government is to be run. Why don’t they go back and help fix the totally broken and crime infested places from which they came. Then come back and show us how....

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 14, 2019

IMAGE FILE

ARCHIVED HERE

http://archive.is/fn3mi

+

Why don't you go back to the Moon - which you think is a part of Mars - rather than crying like a baby whenever you are criticised. Grow some hands man. And get a real brain instead of that hamster you have on your head that does your thinking for you https://t.co/3gICj2wtgr

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) July 15, 2019

How many multiple coincidences are needed to sum to the probability they are not coincidental?

SOMEONE SHOULD MAKE A FEATURE FILM ABOUT THE ENTIRE STORY OF PATRICK MATTHEW

PROUD SCOTTISH FILMMAKER WANTED

In the ENGLISH Linnean Journal (where Darwin's & Wallace's 1858 papers replicated MATTHEW'S prior #SCOTTISH breakthrough without citing it!) Dagg plagiarizes MY Selby discovery!
You could not write this for fiction. Critics would claim it was unrealistic: https://t.co/tvgtt3FThh pic.twitter.com/tLqeD9Tx2h

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) June 16, 2019

Trump is a moron

More trump moronic stupidity

Trump is a total fool

The President of the USA thinks the Moon is part of Mars http://archive.is/7582c

For all of the money we are spending, NASA should NOT be talking about going to the Moon - We did that 50 years ago. They should be focused on the much bigger things we are doing, including Mars (of which the Moon is a part), Defense and Science!

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) June 7, 2019

Badly worded questions

In Maths classes 

The point is the way it is phrased it can be interpreted as meaning either

1. Both adults buy the same. Each buys a single to leeds and each buys a return to Hull
Or
2. Both buy different tickets. One gets a single to Leeds and the other buys a return to Hull. @faceblindandy pic.twitter.com/M2fNrn6w74

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 26, 2019

.

So 3 poss. answers
1. Both buy the same. Each buys a single to leeds and each buys a return to Hull
2. Both buy different tickets. One gets a single to Leeds & the other buys a return to Hull.
3. One gets a return that takes him to Hull & back and then both get singles to Leeds.

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 27, 2019

Biology examinations

In Biology, kids will be penalised for writing historically correct answers that examiners dislike. See image
A perfectly valid answer is: "Because it is NOT his theory. Patrick Matthew prior published it & his known influencers prior-cited Matthew.
Proof: https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/Kcrs3o13zL

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 27, 2019

Trump recants his anti-vax stance. Were they baby killing tweets?

Amid pressure @Hollyonline to blimp him with measles baby of himself in London during State Visit to UK in June Donald Trump finally recants on what may well be his baby killing Twitter nonsense about vaccines causing autism

1. https://t.co/3G8OAKl53j
2. https://t.co/fYpTRpC9XO pic.twitter.com/s40qQFtQO1

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 26, 2019

Hard Data on Managerialist Stupidity and Lost Plot Work

A hospital has found a unique way of reducing needle stick injuries.. well the reporting of them atleast.

Evidence of why healthcare policy needs input from clinicians pic.twitter.com/mQcq6KEq5E

— Zachary Byfield (@ZacharyByfield) April 26, 2019

.

Such written statements of #Managerialist policy are independently verifiable proof they exist. We must not let these disappear into the ether. This is very important research data.

Earlier we shared and tweeted on Nottingham Trent University's Staff Social Media Policy dictats pic.twitter.com/2hNSNWmtI6

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 26, 2019

Managerialism and the decline of the university

#Juxtasupposin

#Juxtasupposin pic.twitter.com/hk3Dn1tS2D

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 18, 2019

They know not what they had

Why did the Scots demolish this lovely house? It should have been a national monument to their great science hero Patrick Matthew. What went wrong? The answer is science fraud

The House: https://t.co/4TmTyPRwX9

The Fraud:
1. https://t.co/3XMQL72PHL
2. https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/1oUTGBBgkI

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 15, 2019

On the plagiarism of facts by those who fell for the dysology they debunk

Email from crime prevention practitioner expert in USA. Quoted my text below and wrote: "I still find one of the most hilarious, and correct, comments I've read in criminology in the past years is yours from your RAT article. Funniest thing I've read :-) " https://t.co/aR3151ssfD pic.twitter.com/A7xki5z1h5

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 14, 2019

.

Trouble is, original discovery of flaw, revealed in my article will be plagiarised by those credulous enough to fall for it. But I won't be cited. Same thing happened recently with my original discovery that other naturalists DID prior cite Patrick Matthew https://t.co/tvgtt3FThh https://t.co/sHBN3vOYyr

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 14, 2019

Blatant Lies at the Heart of the Establishment

This is #Managerialism - the same kind of sociopathic systematic blatant bully lying that has ruined our universities and governments.

Donald Trump claims not to know much about wikileaks not his thing in life - but it sooooo is. What a blatant liar: https://t.co/kOR90iWAsu

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 12, 2019

Worlds Worst PR Disasters

IMAGES CONTENT ARCHIVED: http://archive.is/BguSV and NTU content on its April Fools joke here http://archive.is/C1kmR

Nottingham Trent University April Fools day (2019) joke backfires on April 2nd.  I bet the senior managers and Board of Governors wish they had that cloak today. Because, seriously, what the jobs for academic dullards cult of managerialism is doing is no joke for the proper academics at NTU.

Next day, April 2nd (2019) the cloak was lifted on Twitter and by the Times Higher

https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/union-says-intolerable-workloads-driving-rise-staff-sickness#comment-37011

Then see if your joke can disappear the misery that the #CultOfManagerialism has caused to your university.

Uncloaked, the reality is no joke. Real people's lives are being ruined by the bonus greed-driven management @NTU. See: https://t.co/ZagYUDQQdl#UniversityNearYou

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) April 2, 2019

References

YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5Xcs45ovQ8&feature=youtu.be

The Times Higher Education (THE) https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/union-says-intolerable-workloads-driving-rise-staff-sickness

PLEASE RE-TWEET

Worlds Worst #PR Disasters. No1. Nottingham Trent University's April Fools Invisibility Cloak is Lifted on April 2nd https://t.co/fYrRIwwmny pic.twitter.com/uYKcAn0F0E

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) April 2, 2019

Coincidence: Or not, as the case may be

Coincidence?

What do I, the Dutch Prime Minister @markrutte. and Charles Darwin have in common (or not as the case may be)? https://t.co/7fiuVrZF8y pic.twitter.com/TeePfoYrR0

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 18, 2019

Sent from a topographic ocean of demented and delusional harassment

Sent regarding a #TopographicOcean of hate, bile, stalking, demented harassment, even facilitated (@LinneanSociety) plagiarism of academics making hugely unwelcome breakthroughs in any kind of scientific, historical, sociological, psychology, knowledge etchttps://t.co/uucKHQlY7Z pic.twitter.com/EP79ODWoLm

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) March 15, 2019

Hell has a Place for Science Fraudsters: Cheat and be Damned for Eternity on the Internet

Don't be a Darwin

Don't plagiarise the original ideas/discoveries of others! You will be detected with #BigData technology.

They never had it 160 years ago. But in the C21st it finally caught #CharlesDarwin in #ScienceFraud by plagiary & lies. Today, it can catch anyone: https://t.co/CLKiPRJoQT pic.twitter.com/oTC8TTsDOU

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 16, 2019

Darwin Cat, Darwin Cat, Darwin Cat, sitting on the door mat!

For 160 years, pseudo scholars and ignorant creationist have lampooned Charles Darwin as a monkey or ape. They got that wrong. They should have been lampooning him as a copycat.

Darwin is the world's greatest plagiarising science fraudster by glory theft of a prior published theory. A theory that his friends, influencers and influencer's influencers read and are newly discovered to have cited in the literature before he or Wallace wrote a word on the topic anywhere (see Nullius).

For 160 years Darwin has been lampooned by creationists as an ape or monkey. What scholars should have been doing is lampooning him as a cat, a #CopyCat.

Darwin is the World's greatest plagiarist & serial liar about Patrick Matthew, whose theory he stole https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL pic.twitter.com/bCd1JqRmJa

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) March 10, 2019

Felson's RAT notion of Crime Opportunity is not a cause of crime

Crime of attempted criminal damage & affray is crime. @ProfRArmitage @PaulEkblom1 As is assault of what turns out to be an incapable guardian have a go hero. Confirming that so called "opportunity is a cause of crime" is only ever post-hoc truism nonsense: https://t.co/R9G13EoGC8

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 10, 2019

On The Immortal Shame of the Linnean Journal

Amazing just how much of a role the esteemed Linnean Society @BiolJLinnSoc @BotJLinnSoc @LinneanSociety @ZoolJLinnSoc has played in supporting the credulous worship of plagiarists and proven woo-woo idiots. And it continues to do so today. Get the facts: https://t.co/MDFL9kDbMG pic.twitter.com/9qDbrNBJ7n

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 7, 2019

Antixaxxers such as the famous plagiarist Alfred Russel Wallace and other pillocks

We know that Alfred Wallace, like Charles Darwin (1858/59), committed the world's greatest science fraud by plagiarising Patrick Matthew's (1831) prior published theory of evolution by natural selection years after their friends, correspondents, editors and influencer's influencers had cited it in the historic literature record (see the fully referenced independently verifiable facts of that matter: Here, here and here). Alfred Wallace also paved the way for today's anti-vaccination movement (see the facts here). What a prat! No really, Wallace was. The utter pillock not only claimed to have conceived Matthew's prior published theory (which we newly know - thanks to my original research - Selby, the editor of Wallace's famous Sarawak paper, read and prior-cited) during the world's only stupidly claimed bout of cognitive enhancing malarial fever, he also ardently believed in ghosts and the silly ghost table-turning claims of parlour room mediums (see the facts here).

Today, to its eternal shame, the Linnean Journal - which published Darwin's and Wallace's first act of joint plagiarism of Matthew's theory in 1858 - published a desperately daft-as-a-brush paper by someone called Dagg, which blatantly plagiarised my Selby cited Matthew discovery by failing to cite me as its discoverer. Dagg then bragged to the obscene lonely and obsessed weirdo harassing stalker Julian Derry about failing to cite me (read all the verifiable fully referenced facts here). Doesn't look like a great advert for the Linnean Society and its journal does it. Prattism appears to be contagious. Maybe we need to work harder to discover an efficacious inoculation against it.

Likely hub for transmission of viruses flu & measles. The consequences of quackery @EdzardErnst @HealthWatch123 @QuackDetector

Will Donald Trump and his pal Wakefield be attending?
1. https://t.co/V2XSYmloUN

Alfred Wallace worshipers? @BiolJLinnSoc 2. https://t.co/3RGaiHFeXJ pic.twitter.com/Q1UX6CS0y9

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 7, 2019

So Many People Don't Really Understand the Theory of Macroevolution by Natural Selection

Cartoon based on fake facts & ignorance.

1. It's not Darwin's theory! Patrick Matthew conceived it first. Darwin & Wallace plagiarised it from him. FACTS: https://t.co/E8QuuMzsSL

2. Humans did not evolve from gorillas. We & Chimps ramified from a now extinct common ancestor. pic.twitter.com/fnoCdcgaqD

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 7, 2019

-

Yes, very strictly speaking, "Cousin Hugh" 😀, but I think it fair to suspect it is most likely implying the notion that modern humans evolved from gorillas. pic.twitter.com/hC5WmW8S6t

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) February 7, 2019

When Artificial Intelligence is the Problem and Not any Solution

Did Google's Rank Brain autonomous AI program wreck the Google Library?

E.G. Google leveraged an army of unpaid volunteers to scan 30+ million publications for the Google Library of Internet searchable publications. The idea being they would make publications and facts findable. Then handed it all over to AI. See what happened https://t.co/7Vi9iiZdbI pic.twitter.com/f6ipPdxLtI

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) February 4, 2019

Further pre-1858 Citations of Matthew's 1831 Book

Following the many newly unearthed citations of Matthew's (1831) book "On Naval Timber and Arboriculture " revealed in  'Nullius in Verba Darwin's: greatest secret' (Sutton 2014, 2017), here are some newly discovered others that I  found in Jan 2019

1. The anonymous essayist "S G 2" pp 226-227. "Economical uses of the Larch" in  Knight's Penny Magazine, Volume 3, [edited by Charles Knight.] https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=W-E2AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA227&dq=%22Mathew%22+%22naval+timber%22&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizr_2xvIPgAhURtnEKHRn9BQwQ6AEIXjAJ#v=onepage&q=%22Mathew%22%20%22naval%20timber%22&f=false

2. Patrick Matthew citing his (1831) book in  'Testimonials in favour of W.L. Lindsay ... as a candidate for the office of Conservator of the museum of the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh (1852). - Note in this same publication we find a testimonial by Robert Jameson (Darwin's Geology professor no less!Moreover the testimonials are for a naturalist whose work Darwin later relied upon!) (Click here for the details) 

Juxtasupposin the Popeye Iron and Spinach Myth

#JUXTASUPPOSIN

Naturally, #Popeye was a liar as well as a hooligan:
1. https://t.co/ofHGJjKe5C
2. https://t.co/EzQjyX6aEo pic.twitter.com/VlLG7YOuDO

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) January 20, 2019

The Evolution of Fraud

Natural selection aids species in fraud. Darwin was a plagiarising science fraudster by glory theft of that theory. His abilities in deception aided him enormously. Only now, is new technology unweaving his tangled web of lies & science fraud by plagiarismhttps://t.co/yMLRSHW8Vc pic.twitter.com/DKQ2uZoi7k

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) January 18, 2019

Credulous Darwin Worshippers

Darwin and Wallace worshippers (those who unscientifically and credulously desperately deify the proven liar and plagiarist Charles Darwin and his plagiarist friend Alfred Wallace) have lost their pants in public as a result of the new data that has acted like an unwelcome enema, leading them to soil themselves in public (e.g. here).

Here is just one very small, yet not insignificant, example of the New Data (detected with the innovative Big Data  IDD research method), which completely debunks the Darwinist myth, started as a lie by Charles Darwin (because Matthew had already told him the opposite was true) that Matthew was a little know author on scottish forest trees, whose original ideas no one read. In reality, Matthew's (1831) work was prominently advertised in the Encyclopedia Britannica (p. 407) of 1842, the very year in which Darwin wrote his first private essay on the topic of Matthew's prior published theory of what Matthew originally coined the 'natural process of slection' and Darwin four-word shuffle plagiarized into the 'process of natural slection'. This is just one of so many newly uncovered examples of the prominence of Matthew's book and the bombshell breakthrough ideas in it in the first half of the 19th century.

On The Loudon Blyth Connection: Matthewian Knowledge Contamination Probability

We know that in 1832 Loudon reviewed Matthew's (1831) book and most significantly noted that Matthew had something original to say on what he called 'The Origin of Species' no less. Other writers, such as Eiseley and Dempster have noted that Loudon was founder and editor of the Journal that later published Blyth's important articles in the 1835 and 1836 on natural selection. However neither writer appears to have noted - because they most certainly never pointed it out - that Loudon (as editor) could have in some way provided a route for unique Matthewian  knowledge contamination of Blyth's brain - and therefore of Darwin's and Wallace's  brains, pre-1858. Because we know both Darwin and Wallace read those Blyth articles before they replicated Matthew's theory.
+

Eureka Hugh! Page 52 of Dempster 1996 does state that Loudon founded and edited the Magazine of Natural History in which Blyth's papers appeared. But Dempster completely fails to make the link that Loudon could have influenced Blyth through some kind of knowledge contamination.

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) January 9, 2019

+

+

Thanks! Now found it pages 47+ of hardback copy Hugh. But Eisley failed again to note any knowledge contamination (re his 1832 review) probability
Dempster = yes and I see elsewhere (thank you) However, see my reply. He also failed to note any knowledge contamination probability

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) January 9, 2019