Thursday, 16 April 2015

Darwin and the Mysterious Mr X - review of the classic book by Loren Eiseley

Darwin And The Mysterious Mr. X: New Light On The EvolutionistsDarwin And The Mysterious Mr. X: New Light On The Evolutionists by Loren Eiseley
My rating: 5 of 5 stars

This is an important book in the story of the history of natural selection.

One of the most frequently cited discoveries that is conveyed in its pages (pp 72-73) is Eiseley's unique discovery that Darwin (1844) - in a private and unpublished essay - replicated Patrick Matthew's (1831) unique Artificial versus Natural Selection analogy of differences. In that essay, to which Eiseley directs us, he shows hus that Darwin even replicated the precise example Matthew used of the differences between plants raised in nurseries and those selected by nature in the wild. Eiseley then notes that Darwin cited that example as Matthew's in his 1868 book The Descent of Man - but only because Matthew had claimed priority for his theory in the press in 1860.
.
Eiseley concluded that this was too great to be a coincidence and that Darwin had lied when he claimed no prior-knowledge of Matthew's book - which contains the full hypothesis of natural selection

What Eisely missed, however was that professor David Low - Matthew's Perth Academy schoolmate - had twice been first to second use unique "Matthewisms" in his books - which Darwin read. And in his 1834 book Low also replicated Matthew's great and original explanatory analogy.

What Eiseley also missed was that in the Origin of Species Darwin (1859) also replicated Matthew's analogy of differences - only that time he used different examples to explain it.

What is so important about Eiseley's book is that by uncovering what he did in the literature, he enabled us to see further than what Darwin wrote about his so-called "independent discovery" of a prior-published theory to find a purer form of truth in the history of the discovery of natural selection. .

Ths is a classic book for anyone interested in the history of the discovery of natural selection. I highly recommend it to you for your personal library.


View all my reviews

Wednesday, 15 April 2015

Not Satisfied with the Theory Alone, Darwin and Wallace also Stole Matthew's Explanatory Hypothesis!





Read the New Evidence Based Argument: 

Not only was Patrick Matthew (1831) the first to discover and have published the full hypothesis of natural selection, he was also the first to use the powerful Artificial versus Natural Selection Analogy of differences to explain it. This means that the plagiarizing science fraudsters Charles Darwin (1844, 1859, 1868) and Alfred Wallace (1858) replicated Matthew's prior published discovery without citation as well as replicating his powerful and unique explanatory analogy for it. {Read the full story Here}.



















Monday, 13 April 2015

Sunday, 12 April 2015

A Blemish in the Darling Darwin

“When favourite speculations have been long indulged, and much pains have been bestowed on them, they are viewed with that parental partiality, which cannot bear to hear of faults in the object of its attachment. The mere doubt of an impartial observer is offensive ; and the discovery of anything like a blemish in the darling, is not only ascribed to an entire want of discrimination and judgment, but resented as an injury."

                                               William Lawrence 1819




Saturday, 4 April 2015

The Origin of Easter Eggs Newly Discovered

Friday, 3 April 2015

Friday, 27 March 2015

Got 'Em!