Wikipedia: The World's Worst Encyclopedia

 Anyone can write any rubbish they like and publish it for a day or night, or longer on Wikipedia. This makes it the worlds worst encyclopedia.

Why is #Wikipedia the Worlds worst encyclopedia at any one point in time, during any one day or night?@DrMarkGriffiths @philwane

Because anyone can edit it to say anything.

For example, Basil Brush was once Chancellor of Nottingham Trent University. https://t.co/1bNMffC8MT pic.twitter.com/8TXKCi97Bj

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) August 19, 2020

Silly Billy Wikipedia Editors just Invent Stories to Fill their Knowledge Gaps

Silly #Wikipedia editors make stuff up. This is supposed to be about me. But they just made some of it up. Why? Wikipedia is hilarious.  Yet you still get people who believe what it publishes. Why? No better than the Sunday Sport. Probably far less factual https://t.co/xhPkXI3D8z pic.twitter.com/4mS1o3S59L

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Criminotweet) December 19, 2017

Wikipedia is underpinned by pernicious self-serving policy of institutional stealth plagirism

Wikipedia is trying to improve its notorious reputation for unreliably by deliberately plagiarizing my work, and that of other myth busters, under the officially published Wikipedia 'master editor' policy that "experts are scum". Read the shocking story here.