Big Data Discovery that Darwin's and Wallace's Science Fraud is More Likely Than Not

The British Society of Criminology has published my peer reviewed paper on the BigData facilitated discovery that Darwin and Wallace more likely than not committed the worlds greatest science fraud. Please click here  in order to read and then weigh the newly discovered - independently verifiable - hard facts for yourself.

Plagiarizing fraudsters Charles Darwin & Alfred Wallace  

Background

In 2014 I uniquely discovered that Darwin and Wallace more likely than not plagiarized the entire theory of natural selection form Patrick Matthew's 1831 book On Navel timber and Arboriculture. My e-book, which contains far more evidence than I could fit in a 6000 words journal article is available here or else you can buy it quite easily on all Amazon sites throughout the world.

Motto of the Royal Society and title of my book

Church of the Immaculate Conception

Worship St Darwin of Bromley. Witness his miraculous immaculate conception of a prior published theory. See the wonder of how he turned his own lies into Darwinist truth: Here

Piratical Plundering of Navel Timber and Arboriculture

Charles Darwin is no paragon of science in this story. There is no place for respectability on a creaking wooden ship manned by a 'gentleman of science', hell bent on becoming an immortal great thinker in science, by plundering the unique discovery and ideas of another   , placing him only once removed from the villainous ancestor who accumulated the wealth in the first place, upon which his 'respectable' persona is built. In fact, that bloodthirsty yeoman of a robber baron who made the Darwins so privileged deserves our respect more than the World's greatest science fraudster could generate in a dozen science stories.

Trumpet from the rooftopsPublic Domain

Charles Darwin: The World's Greatest Science Fraudster

So I didn't go out of my way to look for honour in the face of Darwin in this book, as he is as good and bad as anyone who finds themselves caught up in the mad scramble for ill-gotten gain and it makes the tale of Darwin, Wallace and Matthew that much better.

Ralph Steadman - genius Gonzo Artist. Friend of Johnny Depp. Resident of Loose.Attribution

The Chequers Inn, Loose, Kent, as the Admiral Benbow.

Nulius in Verba: Darwin's Greatest Secret is a rollicking new evidence-led tale of piracy and plunder of the most important discovery in the history of science   . Published by ThinkerMedia Inc and available on this website for the price of no more than two flagons of ale or a double tot of rum at The Chequers Inn in Loose Kent, one of my favorite English pubs - caught posing here for Ralph Steadman as the Admiral Benbow Inn from Treasure Island. 

NOTE:

This blurb has been plundered, in no small part from Ralph Steadman   .

Were Wallace and Darwin Schnooks or Crooks?

Click HERE to listen to the interview between Myles Power and Me

What did I do as a double-agent anti-conspiracy theorist shape shifting lizard aliien conspirator to deserve this?

And for my next trick I'll shapeshift into a lizard alien whilst writing an anti-conspiracy theory conspiracy theory: http://t.co/3YoAQnAe7c

— Dr Mike Sutton (@Dysology) October 18, 2014

Last of the Historic Sunday Lectures at Conway Hall was on the Newly Discovered Disgrace of Darwin and Wallace

After 104 years of prestigious presentations    the Ethical Society will adopt a new format of Sunday Debates in 2015. Click HERE to read the full story of the last historic lecture at Conway Hall, that was on the discovery of the plagiarism of Patrick Matthew's prior publication of 1831.


Reference

Sutton, M. (2014) A Dreadful Discovery: Big Data Proves Wallace and Darwin Counterfeit Discoverers. Journal Ethical Record. Volume 119 Issue 8 .Pages 7-14 Publisher Conway Hall Ethical Society Full issue available here: http://ethicalrecord.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Ethical-Record-August-September-2014.pdf   

When Naming Jack the Ripper Remember the Piltdown Man Sciance Fraud

A new book - published only yesterday - has become an instant best seller. It's a good book. I like it. However, it is beset by the unresolved unfortunate possibility that science fraud was involved in reaching the author's conclusions. I hope all of my suspicions can be allayed.

I actually want to know that I can feel confident the author has finally and uniquely solved the great science and criminological  problem of "who was Jack the Ripper" because I want to toast him and his scientific collaborator. But I can't just yet. To find out why not, please read my critical review here.